Lagos Lawyer, Inibehe Effiong writes Kafarati, wants FHC Phone Seizure policy reversed immediately

Below is the letter to the Chief Judge of Federal High Court, Hon. Justice Kafarati.

8th March, 2018

The Honourable Chief Judge,
Federal High Court of Nigeria,
Federal High Court Complex,
Federal Capital Territory,

My Lord,


The above subject matter refers.

My name is Inibehe Effiong, a Lagos-based legal practitioner and the Principal in the law firm of INIBEHE EFFIONG CHAMBERS.

I am impelled to respectfully write to draw the attention of My Lord to the practice of seizing mobile phones and other communication gadgets from legal practitioners by security officials at the entrance/screening point of the Federal High Court premises in Abuja; as a precondition for allowing lawyers access into the main building of the Court.

In all the days that I had cause to be in the court, the most recent being Thursday 8th March, 2018, I was subjected to undignified treatment by the security officials. My phones and Ipad were taken from me and I was given a phone identification tag which is used to identify and retrieve phones when exiting the premises of the Court.

In one occasion, I sought explanation from the security officials on the justification and basis for not allowing lawyers to carry their phones and other communication gadgets into the main building of the Court, I was told in a dismissive tone that the seizure of phones is based on “Order from above” and that it is a security policy of the Court.

My Lord, it is somewhat embarrassing that legal practitioners are being treated as “security threats” to the Temple of Justice where they are Ministers by virtue of their Call and Enrolment as Barristers and Solicitors of the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

Interestingly, staff of the Court are allowed to gain access to the Court with their phones but lawyers who are members of the Bar, an arm of the Nigerian Judiciary, are not.

Beyond the embarrassment and ridicule of stopping lawyers from carrying their phones into the main court premises, it is pertinent to note that lawyers have invariably been denied access to research and also prevented from attending to emergencies which may arise while they are inside the Court’s premises.

A lawyer who needs to meet with a
Bailiff of the Court will be frustrated if he gets to the Bailiff Section only to realise that the particular Bailiff he wanted to meet with is not within sight. The lawyer will then have to go to the ground floor to retrieve his phone and call the Bailiff. Also, where a lawyer is in court for a matter but realises that the counsel on the other side is not inside the Court, such a lawyer will be handicapped from contacting his professional colleague over the phone to enquire about the latter’s where about. A lawyer whose wife, child or other relation or client is in emergency situation will not be able to respond and attend to the situation because his phone which is the only means by which he could be contacted is not within reach, having been seized at the entrance of the Court.

My Lord, above are just few examples of the avoidable problems and difficulties that lawyers are being subjected to by reason of this practice.

I submit with respect that in this computer age where the world is a global village, phones have become indispensable.

By the ethics of our profession, the use of mobile phones and other communication gadgets are only restricted inside the Court when the Judge is sitting as doing otherwise may constitute contempt. The essence by my modest understanding is to prevent the disruption of Court proceedings.

I urge My Lord to look at this matter and do justice to it. It is a sad commentary that lawyers are being targeted by security officials in the court like other members of the society. Our professional prestige has been eroded by security officials who have been emboldened to confront, insult and denigrate any lawyer who dares to question them.

If medical doctors are allowed to carry their phones into the hospital; if teachers are allowed to carry their phones into school premises; if soldiers are allowed to carry their phones into the barracks, one wonders why lawyers in Nigeria are not allowed to carry their phones into the main building of the Federal High Court in Abuja.

I pray My Lord to find and hold that this policy or practice is totally indefensible, denigrating and amounts to an attack on the status of a legal practioner.

Lastly, I most humbly pray My Lord to issue a directive reversing, cancelling and repealing this practice or policy.

May it please My Lord.

Yours faithfully,


The President,
Nigerian Bar Association,
NBA National Secretariat, NBA House,
Central Business District,
F.C.T., Abuja.

Share your Story with us on Whatsapp +2348060798767,  Facebook, Twitter

Join our Whatsapp  group and get instant updates. Click HERE

Click HERE to advertise with us


Notable 2016 Divorce Case: Justice Theresa Uzokwe (Abia State CJ) v. Dr Afam Uzokwe: An interesting case where the court ruled against its own


Notable SC Judgement 2017: Abubakar vs Usman: Court Order SAN to Pay 1M for ill-advising Client (Full Judgement)


London court jails five Nigerians for £610,000 telephone banking fraud


SAN’s right of audience in Magistrate Court: Read Full Judgement




Powered by Facebook Comments