DAUDU Vs. FRN not an authority for section 84, Evidence Act
DAUDU Vs. FRN not an authority for SECTION 84, EVIDENCE ACT, 2011, as culled by Uche Onyedum ESQ from the presentation made by HON. JUSTICE ALABA OMOLAYE-AJILEYE at the just concluded Criminal Law Review Conference 2018
The case of DAUDU Vs. FRN (2018) LPELR-SC 172/2017 has the effect of whittling down the effect of Section 84 of the Evidence Act. However, attention must be paid to the salient but crucial point that approval of the documents as admissible evidence by the Supreme Court was not solely based on the fact of certification by the banks.
The decision of the apex court was based more on the fact that the appellant himself relied on the same documents for his defence. It was therefore, held that he cannot rely on the documents for his defence and at the same time ask that they be expunged from the records.
This is a most prominent distinguishing feature in the case that may not make it a relevant authority in all circumstances.
As a matter of fact, this case was decided on its own peculiar facts and ought not to stand as an authority for the proposition that computer generated statements of accounts need not comply with Section 84(1), (2) and (4) of the Evidence Act, 2011
Win your Court cases today, Get Affordable Supreme Court Law Reports >> CLICK HERE
BESTSELLER: Get A-Z of contemporary laws of ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE in Nigeria By Alaba Omolaye-Ajileye. To ORDER, sms or call : +2347063666998, +2348159307051 or email email@example.com
Supreme Court Judgments on Lands (1907-2013) and Nigerian Company Law Cases (1945-2016) are going for 120k per set.The Reports contain valuable and uncommon locus classicus for Legal research, opinion, and advocacy. Grab your copy now!!! Call 09091130714 or 07084004038